Should There Be Another Batman?

Lately, articles have been popping up regarding the possibility of a Dark Knight sequel not happening. Rumors such as Warner Brothers having a short-list of replacement directors to close sources saying that Nolan won’t return to the film due to Heath Ledgers’ death. As much as many want a sequel to The Dark Knight, should there really be one?

The Dark Knight was a box office juggernaut grossing a little over 1 billion dollars world wide. It is a no brainer that Warner Bros. is pushing Nolan to bring in a sequel regardless of the quality. The hype surrounding Dark Knight, which was also helped by the untimely and unfortunate death of Heath Ledger, propelled this movie into being a must see not just for comic book and pop culture fans alike, but also for all movie goers. My own opinion on the movie, it is the epitome of what Super Hero movies can be when given care and development.

Regardless of the fanboy trolling or praise, or movie studios thirst for money, should there really be a sequel to The Dark Knight? I’m on the side of the fence that is saying to not even go there. Personally, TDK is one of the greatest translations of a comic book character to another medium. As much as I and others would like to see a continuation of the world that Nolan created for the new Batman, the ability to be consistent with the quality of story always comes into question.

Heath Ledgers death unfortunately help propel the movie to a much higher success. Whether the success of the movie would have matched it based on hype alone and not his death will be something we will never know, but Ledger’s brilliant performance as The Joker outshone and made The Dark Knight. Any actor taking up a villain role either as The Joker or someone else in the rogues gallery has to live up to the standard set forth by Ledger and under Nolan’s guidance to fit into the universe. It wasn’t like the Tim Burton interpretation where Jack Nicholson played as The Joker. Ledger became The Joker. Transforming into a character and becoming something unrecognizable to yourself is difficult and almost unmatched by Ledger’s performance.

Christopher Nolan has a clear vision and story he intends to tell with Batman and the characters surrounding his interpretation. Reports stated but never confirmed by Nolan that his latest film was to feature The Joker as the prominent villain in the sequel. While Ledger’s Joker would have been great to see in a sequel to TDK, it seems more of a retread as many will say that The Joker was the star and villain of TDK. As much as mainstream pop culture and the nerd fanbase love the Clown Prince of Crime, in Nolan’s Batman introducing or reintroducing one of Batman’s many villains would allow the world to grow and tell other stories surrounding Gotham City, Batman, and the people.

As any movie studio that hits a cash flow boom with a successful franchise, they want to continue that cash flow. The one name that keeps popping up as a replacement director in case if Nolan decides not to return to his Batman world is Zack Snyder. The problem with changing directors with different styles is the shift in tone and execution. Nolan’s Batman films are very story driven filled with more drama then a high school prom. Zack Snyder visual style is very slick and sexy but has been shown that he is very dependent on the source material using it as a literal translation from page to movie screens. If Snyder or any other director were to take the reigns of Nolan’s Batman they would be put under pressure by the public and the studio to make another Dark Knight.

History tends to repeat itself but with the Batman franchise the 90’s is plagued with bat-nipples along with the rest of the camp and crap of the first franchise. Movie studios should not mess up a good thing and ruin this franchise the George Lucas way by shoveling half-assed stories just because “that’s what fans want.” If Christopher Nolan walks away from this series then the franchise should take a rest and wait 5 to 10 years before relaunching with a new director with a new vision.

More importantly what do you guys think of a sequel to The Dark Knight?

Posted by Nerd Boy Wonder 29 June Permalink

Batman Begins/ The Dark Knight: The Mantle

Last week, I talked about the fact that the Batman movies have roots in deeper levels of human understanding and this week I continue on that path with the idea of ‘The Mantle’. The Mantle is referenced both covertly and overtly within both movies and bears discussing because there is a heroic mantle of the man who will bring Gotham peace and justice, and a more sinister mantle that will devolve Gotham into Chaos.

The mantle of Batman starts not with Bruce, but his father. Thomas Wayne and his wife strived to use their riches to make Gotham a better place. It is rare that we see what exactly Martha did, but Thomas was a doctor and left WayneCorp (the company that helped Gotham) to “better men”, a fact that young Bruce has a problem believing, as he looks up to his father.

Tracing the roots back further, we later find out that Bruce’s family was involved in the underground railroad. The first movie makes lot of reference to the Wayne name and how much it means when in fact, it’s never been about the name.  As both Bruce and Alfred later realize, it’s about the meaning OF that name.

Interesting enough, Wayne is the prominent force in Batman Begins and Batman the name is the force in The Dark Knight. In this film, we realize that it’s not Batman’s name that means something.  It’s what he is accomplishing. But why does Bruce do these things?

Thomas Wayne was a doctor and a healer and wished to help people.  That lesson seems to resonate in Bruce, as shown in the flashback to Thomas letting Bruce listen to his heart. The death of Thomas rattled him so much he wanted nothing but vengeance and to cleanse the world of Joe Chill, but Rachel snaps Bruce out of that mindset when she reminds him, “your father would be ashamed of you.” Bruce already knew he wasn’t living to his fathers ideal, but he thought still he was doing the right thing. Now knowing that he was wrong, he journeys to find his path, but becomes lost.

It is with Ducard that Bruce finds his way, but he hasn’t forgotten the lesson of his father. He will not kill, he will not violate the one rule that most doctors, Thomas Wayne included, find sacred. He is seen as foolish for being compassionate, but that was what Bruce’s father was. Later, Ra’s al Ghul belittles Thomas’ compassion as idealism, but it in fact strengthens Bruce’s resolve to know that he WILL defend Gotham. His father stood between a gunman and him and Bruce stands between the scum of Gotham and Gotham itself.

Bruce chooses the symbol of the bat to do his nightly masquerade of taking it to the criminal empire, but it’s the mission that makes him really take up the mantle of the Wayne legacy. He will not kill, he will help those that cannot help themselves. It’s told by Alfred that the death of the Wayne’s shocked the powerful into action and Bruce decides to use the bat personna to shock the people into action. It works, as we see in The Dark Knight.

The Dark Knight shows two versions of the bat mantle being lifted. We have the Sons of Batmen, who take the more vigilante aspect of the mission, and Harvey Dent, who goes after criminals using the law. It should be noted that Bruce respects the law more than vigilance. In fact, he actively seeks to end his own vigilance because he sees it as a temporary thing.

Many comic fans have a problem with the idea that Batman doesn’t want to be Batman forever, but in the realistic world, it makes a lot of sense. A man who respects the law and the idea of compassion as much as Bruce Wayne would not want to be a vigilante forever, which is why the arrival of Harvey Dent is such a relief to Bruce Wayne. Much like the tale that Harvey says about a man’s duty to stand up and defend the city and then relinquish it, Batman sees himself doing just that.

No one is worthy of that; Harvey, due to his own want for vigilante justice, and the Sons of Batman for much the same reason.  Batman wishes to inspire others, but not to be like him. I will cover vigilance in a later article, but what other mantle is in the two Batman movies? The mantle of injustice.

When the movies begin, Falcone and his crime family are firmly in control. It takes a more serious twist when Batman captures him.  Inside the asylum, he makes a remark that no one can get him, not in his town. Probably the first shiver a comic fan gets in regards to that thought is in the comics. The gangsters believe the town is theirs and that it is being taken over by the freaks, which is why the next line in the film is so chilling, when Jonathan Crane simply asks, “do you want to see my mask?”

Next, in The Dark Knight, the gangsters realize that, with the presence of the Batman, they no longer have as much power as before. The gangster bank manager realizes that the criminals don’t believe in honor or respect anymore, a very true statement in regards to The Joker. The mantle of of this super villain is firmly held in place due to how he commands a room, how he is a man of his word and how he pretty much decimates the criminal empire. The final nail in the coffin is when the Russian seeks to try and understand him. The Joker says that the city deserves a better class of criminal. Much like Batman might be considered a better class of citizen, a man who stands up to corruption, the Joker is a better class of criminal and stands up to the Batman.

I will be covering the relationship and parallels between Joker and Batman another time, but it’s a fact that they both represent the truist ideas of the superhero genre. The hero who wants to inspire and the villain who wants to destroy. They are the yin and yang, the ones who bear the mantle of hero and villain. Is it any wonder that The Joker believes they will in fact, “do this forever”?

The mantle of a hero is hard to assume, as evidenced by Harvey Dent cracking under the pressure. Likewise, a villain only has a tenuous hold on a mantle, but The Joker is unique in that he represents a clear opposition to the idea of a hero. Next time, we will analyze this relationship and how The Batman, in some ways, is like the Joker.

-DarkSpirit-

Posted by Nerd Boy Wonder 10 February Permalink